EBND vs. IEMG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG).

EBND and IEMG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both EBND and IEMG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EBND vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EBND vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF	-2.55%	15.83%	-2.70%	9.02%	-11.84%	-9.66%	4.49%	10.40%	-6.52%	13.93%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	3.76%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 3.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EBND has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 1.42%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.23% annualized return.

EBND

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -0.61%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: 4.78%
• 5Y*: 0.35%
• 10Y*: 1.42%

IEMG

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -9.13%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 7.65%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBND vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.

EBND

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF

IEMG

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Return for Risk

EBND vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBND

EBND Risk / Return Rank: 67
EBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EBND Omega Ratio Rank: 70
EBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EBND Martin Ratio Rank: 64

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 86
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBND vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBND	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.68	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.27	-0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.34	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	2.48	-1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.16	9.61	-3.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBND vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBND and IEMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBND	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	1.68	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.25	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.42	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.28	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between EBND and IEMG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EBND vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than IEMG's 2.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF	5.80%	5.54%	5.89%	5.26%	4.75%	3.83%	3.67%	4.68%	4.70%	2.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.65%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Drawdowns

EBND vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.51%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBND	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.51%	-38.71%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-13.21%	+6.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	-35.93%	+8.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.50%	-38.71%	+9.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.49%	-10.08%	+4.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.96%	-13.11%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	3.41%	-1.92%

Volatility

EBND vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) is 3.89%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that EBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBND	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	10.48%	-6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.82%	14.67%	-9.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.16%	19.78%	-12.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.90%	17.91%	-9.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.18%	19.84%	-10.66%