PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EBND vs. IEMG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


EBNDIEMG
YTD Return-1.25%11.77%
1Y Return4.85%18.93%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.29%-0.80%
5Y Return (Ann)-1.74%4.16%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.55%3.90%
Sharpe Ratio0.641.26
Sortino Ratio1.001.84
Omega Ratio1.121.23
Calmar Ratio0.250.70
Martin Ratio1.756.69
Ulcer Index2.80%2.79%
Daily Std Dev7.61%14.81%
Max Drawdown-29.50%-38.72%
Current Drawdown-14.58%-11.48%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between EBND and IEMG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EBND vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EBND has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of -0.55%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.90% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.04%
6.47%
EBND
IEMG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EBND vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.14% expense ratio.


EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for EBND: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%
Expense ratio chart for IEMG: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EBND vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EBND
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EBND, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EBND, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EBND, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EBND, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EBND, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.75
IEMG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IEMG, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IEMG, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IEMG, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IEMG, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IEMG, currently valued at 6.69, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.69

EBND vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBND Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBND and IEMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.64
1.26
EBND
IEMG

Dividends

EBND vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than IEMG's 2.65% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EBND
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
5.81%5.27%4.74%3.83%3.67%4.68%4.70%2.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%2.31%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.65%2.89%2.70%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.34%2.28%2.52%2.30%1.76%

Drawdowns

EBND vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.50%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and IEMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.58%
-11.48%
EBND
IEMG

Volatility

EBND vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) is 2.10%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that EBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.10%
3.50%
EBND
IEMG