EBND vs. HYG
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG).
EBND and HYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. HYG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. It was launched on Apr 11, 2007. Both EBND and HYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EBND or HYG.
Key characteristics
| EBND | HYG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.61% | 9.03% |
| 1Y Return | 6.54% | 15.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.23% | 2.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.61% | 3.67% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.48% | 3.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 3.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.12 | 4.87 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.13 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.29 | 2.25 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.99 | 24.23 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.83% | 0.61% |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.88% | 4.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.50% | -34.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.03% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EBND and HYG is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EBND vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EBND achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than HYG's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EBND has underperformed HYG with an annualized return of -0.48%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EBND vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EBND vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EBND vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than HYG's 6.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.77% | 5.27% | 4.74% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 2.31% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.34% | 5.75% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% | 5.69% | 6.10% |
Drawdowns
EBND vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EBND drawdown since its inception was -29.50%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBND and HYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EBND vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.06%. This indicates that EBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.