PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EATZ vs. YUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and YUM is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

EATZ vs. YUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
20.94%
9.07%
EATZ
YUM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EATZ:

1.82

YUM:

0.77

Sortino Ratio

EATZ:

2.61

YUM:

1.35

Omega Ratio

EATZ:

1.32

YUM:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

EATZ:

3.60

YUM:

1.18

Martin Ratio

EATZ:

10.50

YUM:

2.73

Ulcer Index

EATZ:

3.15%

YUM:

5.48%

Daily Std Dev

EATZ:

18.18%

YUM:

19.32%

Max Drawdown

EATZ:

-34.40%

YUM:

-67.69%

Current Drawdown

EATZ:

-1.41%

YUM:

-0.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EATZ achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's 10.25% return.


EATZ

YTD

7.62%

1M

6.97%

6M

19.52%

1Y

28.80%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

YUM

YTD

10.25%

1M

18.03%

6M

9.28%

1Y

12.12%

5Y*

9.01%

10Y*

11.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EATZ vs. YUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EATZ is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EATZ is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

YUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YUM is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YUM is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YUM is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YUM is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YUM is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YUM is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EATZ vs. YUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EATZ, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.820.77
The chart of Sortino ratio for EATZ, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.611.35
The chart of Omega ratio for EATZ, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for EATZ, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.601.18
The chart of Martin ratio for EATZ, currently valued at 10.50, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.502.73
EATZ
YUM

The current EATZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATZ and YUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.82
0.77
EATZ
YUM

Dividends

EATZ vs. YUM - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than YUM's 1.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.17%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YUM
YUM! Brands, Inc.
1.81%2.00%1.87%1.78%1.44%1.73%1.67%1.57%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. YUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EATZ drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATZ and YUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.41%
-0.56%
EATZ
YUM

Volatility

EATZ vs. YUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) is 6.22%, while YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) has a volatility of 10.11%. This indicates that EATZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.22%
10.11%
EATZ
YUM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab