EATZ vs. YUM

In the year-to-date period, EATZ achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than YUM's 8.41% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EATZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the YUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EATZ and YUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than YUM's 1.92% yield.

The maximum EATZ drawdown since its inception was -34.40%, smaller than the maximum YUM drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EATZ and YUM.

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM) at 4.57%. This indicates that EATZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.