EATZ vs. XLP
EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. EATZ is actively managed, while XLP is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EATZ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
EATZ vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EATZ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLP
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.51%
EATZ vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 4.80% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -4.90% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 9.13% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 12.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EATZ and XLP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.35 |
EATZ vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EATZ
XLP
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EATZ
XLP
Consumer Defensive
EATZ
XLP
Industrials
EATZ
XLP
-
Communication Services
EATZ
XLP
-
Basic Materials
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Energy
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Financial Services
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Healthcare
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Real Estate
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Technology
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Utilities
EATZ
-
XLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EATZ vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
EATZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLP
EATZ vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EATZ | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EATZ vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EATZ | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -35.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.82% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.06% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility
EATZ vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EATZ | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 13.13% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 13.36% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.77% | — |
EATZ vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EATZ vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than XLP's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EATZ and XLP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.
EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 0.08% for XLP.
Find the right allocation for EATZ and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer