PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EASG vs. FZILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EASG vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than FZILX's 15.48% return.


EASG

1D
0.53%
1M
3.42%
YTD
8.96%
6M
11.59%
1Y
18.95%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*

FZILX

1D
0.53%
1M
5.00%
YTD
15.48%
6M
18.76%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
8.96%25.19%2.26%18.80%-16.94%11.36%10.73%23.66%-5.41%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
15.48%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and FZILX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018

0.92

The correlation between EASG and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EASG vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EASGFZILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

2.36

-1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

3.20

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.04

-1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.39

11.94

-5.55

EASG vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and FZILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EASGFZILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.36

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.59

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.58

-0.06

Drawdowns

EASG vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum FZILX drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and FZILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EASGFZILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-34.37%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-11.24%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-13.47%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.42%

-29.87%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-6.70%

+0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.86%

+0.31%

Volatility

EASG vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) have volatilities of 5.03% and 4.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EASGFZILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.97%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

12.25%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.57%

14.64%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

15.52%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

17.32%

+1.03%

EASG vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EASG vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than FZILX's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.84%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.32%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EASG and FZILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EASG has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to FZILX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs FZILX's -34.37%.

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EASG and FZILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer