EASG vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EASG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EASG returned 19.79% vs 199.74% for CHPS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

EASG vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.68% return.

EASG

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: 8.01%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -8.79%
• 1M: 14.08%
• YTD: 107.68%
• 6M: 109.36%
• 1Y: 199.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	8.27%	25.19%	2.26%	4.05%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.68%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and CHPS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.63

The correlation between EASG and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

EASG vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EASG	CHPS
Financial Services	24.6%	0.2%
Industrials	18.1%	0.4%
Technology	13.2%	99.6%
Healthcare	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	0.0%
Basic Materials	6.1%	-
Communication Services	5.7%	0.0%
Utilities	3.7%	-
Energy	3.0%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

EASG vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 37
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EASG	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	5.05	-3.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	4.70	-2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.66	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	11.49	-9.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	42.41	-36.14

EASG vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EASG vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASG	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-39.44%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-17.50%	+5.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-8.79%	+6.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-9.08%	+2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	4.73%	-1.56%

Volatility

EASG vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 5.32%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 22.65%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EASG	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	22.65%	-17.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	34.27%	-20.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	39.81%	-23.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	35.53%	-18.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	35.53%	-17.16%

EASG vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EASG vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than CHPS's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.31%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.93%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASG and CHPS in my portfolio?

EASG and CHPS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EASG or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (22.65%) compared to EASG (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, EASG or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 199.74% vs 19.79% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EASG or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 199.74% return vs 19.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASG or CHPS?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASG or CHPS?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.31% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between EASG and CHPS?

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.