EASG vs. CHPS
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS).
EASG and CHPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EASG is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2018. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. Both EASG and CHPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EASG or CHPS.
Correlation
The correlation between EASG and CHPS is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EASG vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EASG:
0.33
CHPS:
-0.27
EASG:
0.63
CHPS:
-0.14
EASG:
1.08
CHPS:
0.98
EASG:
0.39
CHPS:
-0.27
EASG:
1.04
CHPS:
-0.58
EASG:
6.00%
CHPS:
18.20%
EASG:
17.49%
CHPS:
38.54%
EASG:
-32.06%
CHPS:
-39.44%
EASG:
-1.98%
CHPS:
-24.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than CHPS's -5.51% return.
EASG
10.00%
9.14%
6.45%
5.71%
10.32%
N/A
CHPS
-5.51%
7.43%
-11.63%
-10.29%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EASG vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EASG vs. CHPS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EASG
CHPS
EASG vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EASG vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than CHPS's 1.87% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 2.67% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 1.87% | 1.74% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EASG vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and CHPS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EASG vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 4.59%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.