EASG vs. BBIN
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN).
EASG and BBIN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EASG is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2018. BBIN is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2019. Both EASG and BBIN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EASG or BBIN.
Correlation
The correlation between EASG and BBIN is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EASG vs. BBIN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EASG:
0.33
BBIN:
0.59
EASG:
0.63
BBIN:
1.01
EASG:
1.08
BBIN:
1.14
EASG:
0.39
BBIN:
0.82
EASG:
1.04
BBIN:
2.39
EASG:
6.00%
BBIN:
4.79%
EASG:
17.49%
BBIN:
18.11%
EASG:
-32.06%
BBIN:
-33.37%
EASG:
-1.98%
BBIN:
-0.48%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly lower than BBIN's 13.58% return.
EASG
10.00%
9.14%
6.45%
5.71%
10.32%
N/A
BBIN
13.58%
9.23%
10.09%
10.66%
11.98%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EASG vs. BBIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BBIN's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EASG vs. BBIN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EASG
BBIN
EASG vs. BBIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EASG vs. BBIN - Dividend Comparison
EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than BBIN's 3.02% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 2.67% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% |
BBIN JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF | 3.02% | 3.41% | 3.20% | 2.83% | 3.54% | 1.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EASG vs. BBIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BBIN drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and BBIN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EASG vs. BBIN - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.