PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EARN vs. EFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EARNEFC
YTD Return17.10%7.18%
1Y Return21.95%6.52%
3Y Return (Ann)-6.99%0.16%
5Y Return (Ann)2.09%3.07%
10Y Return (Ann)2.37%6.01%
Sharpe Ratio1.410.54
Sortino Ratio2.040.83
Omega Ratio1.281.11
Calmar Ratio0.750.52
Martin Ratio10.002.17
Ulcer Index3.15%5.08%
Daily Std Dev22.31%20.53%
Max Drawdown-66.44%-79.08%
Current Drawdown-26.29%-6.50%

Fundamentals


EARNEFC
Market Cap$167.66M$1.11B
EPS$0.21$1.29
PE Ratio31.529.51
PEG Ratio-1.790.86
Total Revenue (TTM)$18.23M$330.89M
Gross Profit (TTM)$16.63M$260.82M
EBITDA (TTM)$47.68M$170.03M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between EARN and EFC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EARN vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EARN achieves a 17.10% return, which is significantly higher than EFC's 7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, EARN has underperformed EFC with an annualized return of 2.37%, while EFC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.18%
7.63%
EARN
EFC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EARN vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EARN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EARN, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EARN, currently valued at 2.04, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EARN, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EARN, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EARN, currently valued at 10.00, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.00
EFC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EFC, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EFC, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EFC, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EFC, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EFC, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.17

EARN vs. EFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EARN Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EARN and EFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.41
0.54
EARN
EFC

Dividends

EARN vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

EARN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.07%, more than EFC's 13.43% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EARN
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT
15.07%15.66%15.16%11.36%8.59%10.88%14.17%13.04%12.68%16.19%13.52%7.41%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
13.43%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%16.89%

Drawdowns

EARN vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EARN drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum EFC drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EARN and EFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-26.29%
-6.50%
EARN
EFC

Volatility

EARN vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 5.04%. This indicates that EARN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.54%
5.04%
EARN
EFC

Financials

EARN vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items