PortfoliosLab logo
EARN vs. EFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EARN and EFC is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EARN vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EARN:

-0.32

EFC:

0.95

Sortino Ratio

EARN:

-0.46

EFC:

1.32

Omega Ratio

EARN:

0.94

EFC:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

EARN:

-0.24

EFC:

0.97

Martin Ratio

EARN:

-1.21

EFC:

3.21

Ulcer Index

EARN:

8.77%

EFC:

5.69%

Daily Std Dev

EARN:

24.25%

EFC:

21.56%

Max Drawdown

EARN:

-66.44%

EFC:

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

EARN:

-30.29%

EFC:

-10.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EARN:

$209.58M

EFC:

$1.19B

EPS

EARN:

$0.28

EFC:

$1.39

PE Ratio

EARN:

19.93

EFC:

9.06

PEG Ratio

EARN:

-1.79

EFC:

0.86

PS Ratio

EARN:

6.06

EFC:

3.86

PB Ratio

EARN:

1.08

EFC:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

EARN:

$24.04M

EFC:

$284.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EARN:

$7.58M

EFC:

$284.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

EARN:

$12.70M

EFC:

$216.47M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EARN achieves a -11.15% return, which is significantly lower than EFC's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EARN has underperformed EFC with an annualized return of 2.26%, while EFC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.


EARN

YTD

-11.15%

1M

0.72%

6M

-10.49%

1Y

-7.76%

3Y*

2.49%

5Y*

2.14%

10Y*

2.26%

EFC

YTD

8.19%

1M

-1.96%

6M

7.33%

1Y

18.67%

3Y*

7.04%

5Y*

16.85%

10Y*

6.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ellington Financial Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EARN vs. EFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EARN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EARN is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EARN is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EARN is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EARN is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EARN is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EARN is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFC is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFC is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFC is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFC is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFC is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFC is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EARN vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EARN Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EARN and EFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EARN vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

EARN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.20%, more than EFC's 12.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EARN
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT
17.20%14.50%15.66%15.16%11.36%8.59%10.88%14.17%13.04%12.68%16.19%13.52%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
12.38%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%

Drawdowns

EARN vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EARN drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum EFC drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EARN and EFC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EARN vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 5.30%. This indicates that EARN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EARN vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-100.00M-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20212022202320242025
9.25M
72.28M
(EARN) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items