PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EARN vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EARN vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EARN achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EARN has underperformed AGNC with an annualized return of 3.64%, while AGNC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.26% annualized return.


EARN

1D
2.29%
1M
6.53%
YTD
3.82%
6M
6.01%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
-3.51%
10Y*
3.64%

AGNC

1D
0.58%
1M
3.43%
YTD
2.94%
6M
3.70%
1Y
30.57%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
6.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EARN vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EARN
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT
3.82%-5.88%24.65%2.97%-25.04%-11.96%35.60%17.85%-3.09%3.42%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
2.94%34.92%8.90%10.14%-21.65%5.20%-1.78%13.31%-2.46%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EARN and AGNC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2013

0.56

The correlation between EARN and AGNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

EARN:

-$1.67

AGNC:

$1.33

PS Ratio

EARN:

1.92

AGNC:

4.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

EARN:

$53.96M

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EARN:

$41.65M

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

EARN:

-$567.00K

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EARN vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EARN
EARN Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EARN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EARN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EARN Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EARN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EARN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EARN vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EARNAGNCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.27

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.64

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

4.64

-4.04

EARN vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EARN Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the AGNC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EARN and AGNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EARN vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EARN drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than AGNC's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EARN and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EARNAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.44%

-54.56%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.53%

-18.71%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-31.04%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.06%

-50.65%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.44%

-54.56%

-11.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.34%

-9.33%

-14.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.07%

-13.55%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.31%

6.60%

+2.71%

Volatility

EARN vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison

Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (EARN) has a higher volatility of 12.34% compared to AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) at 5.46%. This indicates that EARN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EARNAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.34%

5.46%

+6.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

16.21%

+4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.92%

19.57%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.09%

25.73%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.84%

25.42%

+12.42%

Dividends

EARN vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

EARN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.43%, more than AGNC's 13.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
13.79%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%
EARN
Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT
33.43%18.22%14.50%15.66%15.16%11.36%8.59%10.88%14.17%13.04%12.68%16.19%

Financials

EARN vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B20222023202420252026
12.31M
0
(EARN) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EARN and AGNC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EARN has higher volatility (12.34%) compared to AGNC (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EARN dropped -66.44% vs AGNC's -54.56%.

AGNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EARN and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer