EAH.L vs. DBC
Compare and contrast key facts about Eco Animal Health Group plc (EAH.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC).
DBC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. It was launched on Feb 3, 2006.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EAH.L or DBC.
Correlation
The correlation between EAH.L and DBC is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EAH.L vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EAH.L:
-0.85
DBC:
0.63
EAH.L:
-1.07
DBC:
0.99
EAH.L:
0.82
DBC:
1.12
EAH.L:
-0.43
DBC:
0.18
EAH.L:
-1.14
DBC:
1.74
EAH.L:
31.95%
DBC:
5.15%
EAH.L:
43.15%
DBC:
14.20%
EAH.L:
-85.47%
DBC:
-76.36%
EAH.L:
-85.09%
DBC:
-43.28%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAH.L achieves a -16.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 5.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EAH.L has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 6.84%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.81% annualized return.
EAH.L
-16.20%
-4.80%
-44.65%
-36.50%
-19.34%
6.84%
DBC
5.99%
1.43%
7.23%
8.20%
11.28%
3.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EAH.L vs. DBC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EAH.L
DBC
EAH.L vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eco Animal Health Group plc (EAH.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EAH.L vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
EAH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAH.L Eco Animal Health Group plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 62.50% | 0.00% | 726.57% | 309.76% | 118.83% | 112.87% | 149.61% | 199.52% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 4.92% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EAH.L vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAH.L drawdown since its inception was -85.47%, which is greater than DBC's maximum drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAH.L and DBC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EAH.L vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Eco Animal Health Group plc (EAH.L) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 3.58%. This indicates that EAH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.