PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAEAX vs. HTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (EAEAX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAEAX achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, EAEAX has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 11.49%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.55% annualized return.


EAEAX

1D
1.24%
1M
0.00%
6M
7.38%
YTD
9.94%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.72%
10Y*
11.49%
ALL TIME*
8.64%

HTGC

1D
3.01%
1M
5.45%
6M
-3.83%
YTD
-5.31%
1Y
-2.08%
3Y*
10.85%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
13.55%
ALL TIME*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$24.38M$23.62M$24.96M

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EAEAX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
9.94%12.06%17.99%20.69%-18.19%21.24%15.47%27.44%-5.86%19.16%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
-5.31%3.54%33.33%42.91%-10.42%26.50%14.49%39.86%-6.86%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EAEAX and HTGC is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2005

0.50

The correlation between EAEAX and HTGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAEAX vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EAEAX
EAEAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EAEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EAEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

HTGC
HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (EAEAX) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EAEAXHTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.02

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

-0.00

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

-0.00

+7.89

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAEAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAEAX and HTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAEAX drawdown since its inception was -53.71%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAEAX and HTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAEAXHTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.71%

-68.21%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.37%

-24.74%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.69%

-27.97%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-36.11%

+11.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-57.54%

+22.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-10.47%

+9.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-10.89%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

11.73%

-9.65%

Volatility

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (EAEAX) is 2.98%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 6.80%. This indicates that EAEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAEAXHTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

6.80%

-3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

20.91%

-11.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

24.11%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

25.93%

-10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

27.91%

-11.08%

Dividends

EAEAX vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

EAEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than HTGC's 13.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAEAX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
3.90%4.29%0.80%0.53%0.79%2.58%0.57%1.87%2.12%3.13%1.10%6.32%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
13.40%9.99%9.56%11.40%13.77%9.76%9.02%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAEAX and HTGC have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTGC has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to EAEAX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAEAX dropped -53.71% vs HTGC's -68.21%.

EAEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAEAX and HTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer