EADSY vs. LMT

In the year-to-date period, EADSY achieves a 4.17% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's -1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EADSY has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 11.03%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EADSY Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADSY and LMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EADSY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.

The maximum EADSY drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADSY and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Airbus Group NV (EADSY) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 9.01%. This indicates that EADSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airbus Group NV and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.