PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EADSY vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EADSY vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Airbus SE (EADSY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EADSY achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EADSY has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 16.33%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.19% annualized return.


EADSY

1D
-1.78%
1M
6.50%
6M
-10.78%
YTD
-2.81%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
16.33%

LMT

1D
-0.49%
1M
-3.64%
6M
-4.42%
YTD
8.93%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EADSY vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EADSY
Airbus SE
-2.81%48.47%5.12%31.83%-5.67%16.80%-23.13%56.19%-2.87%56.26%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
8.93%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EADSY and LMT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.25

The correlation between EADSY and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EADSY:

$173.91B

LMT:

$120.05B

EPS

EADSY:

€1.58

LMT:

$20.67

PE Ratio

EADSY:

30.62

LMT:

25.20

PS Ratio

EADSY:

2.11

LMT:

1.61

PB Ratio

EADSY:

5.85

LMT:

16.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

EADSY:

€72.49B

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EADSY:

€10.64B

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

EADSY:

€8.44B

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EADSY vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EADSY
EADSY Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EADSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EADSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EADSY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EADSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EADSY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EADSY vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbus SE (EADSY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EADSYLMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.12

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

0.54

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.42

1.18

-0.77

EADSY vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EADSY Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADSY and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EADSY vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EADSY drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADSY and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EADSYLMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.67%

-79.29%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.47%

-26.87%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.47%

-31.79%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.58%

-31.79%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.74%

-36.67%

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.17%

-22.55%

+10.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.12%

-26.83%

-15.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.00%

12.20%

+0.80%

Volatility

EADSY vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Airbus SE (EADSY) is 8.64%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that EADSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EADSYLMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.64%

10.80%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.13%

20.38%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.06%

27.28%

+3.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.56%

23.32%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.22%

23.94%

+12.28%

Dividends

EADSY vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

EADSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than LMT's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EADSY
Airbus SE
1.69%1.39%1.90%1.24%1.39%0.00%1.84%0.95%1.45%2.66%4.45%2.08%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.62%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%

Financials

EADSY vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airbus SE and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
12.86B
18.02B
(EADSY) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EADSY values in EUR, LMT values in USD

EADSY vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Airbus SE and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
12.3%
11.5%
Portfolio components
EADSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Airbus SE reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 12.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

EADSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Airbus SE reported an operating income of 190.08M and revenue of 12.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

EADSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Airbus SE reported a net income of 595.64M and revenue of 12.86B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EADSY and LMT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMT has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to EADSY (8.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EADSY dropped -81.67% vs LMT's -79.29%.

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EADSY and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer