EADSY vs. LMT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EADSY (Airbus Group NV) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, EADSY returned 14.72%/yr vs 10.84%/yr for LMT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EADSY vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EADSY achieves a -12.03% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 7.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EADSY has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 14.72%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.

EADSY

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -3.38%
• YTD: -12.03%
• 6M: -8.16%
• 1Y: 8.78%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

LMT

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 10.12%
• 3Y*: 6.98%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: 10.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EADSY vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EADSY Airbus Group NV	-12.03%	48.47%	5.12%	31.83%	-5.67%	16.80%	-23.13%	56.19%	-2.87%	56.26%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	7.41%	2.47%	10.02%	-4.31%	40.48%	3.15%	-6.49%	52.55%	-16.35%	31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EADSY and LMT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007	0.25

The correlation between EADSY and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap EADSY : $157.76B LMT : $118.65B
EPS EADSY : $1.58 LMT : $20.61
PE Ratio EADSY : 31.59 LMT : 24.91
PS Ratio EADSY : 2.18 LMT : 1.59
PB Ratio EADSY : 6.04 LMT : 15.84
Total Revenue (TTM) EADSY : $72.49B LMT : $75.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) EADSY : $10.64B LMT : $7.37B
EBITDA (TTM) EADSY : $8.44B LMT : $8.09B

Return for Risk

EADSY vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EADSY

EADSY Risk / Return Rank: 47
EADSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EADSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
EADSY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EADSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EADSY Martin Ratio Rank: 50

LMT

LMT Risk / Return Rank: 49
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EADSY vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EADSY	LMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	0.38	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	0.67	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.09	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	0.40	-0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.93	1.00	-0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EADSY vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EADSY Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is comparable to the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADSY and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EADSY	LMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	0.38	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.38	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.46	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.38	-0.28

Drawdowns

EADSY vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EADSY drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADSY and LMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EADSY	LMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.67%	-79.29%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.47%	-25.15%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.47%	-31.79%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.58%	-31.79%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.74%	-36.67%	-28.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.50%	-23.63%	+3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.29%	-26.84%	-15.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.13%	10.11%	+2.02%

Volatility

EADSY vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Airbus Group NV (EADSY) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.55%. This indicates that EADSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EADSY	LMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.10%	5.55%	+6.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.60%	19.87%	+5.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.47%	26.54%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.38%	22.89%	+7.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.37%	23.71%	+12.66%

Dividends

EADSY vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

EADSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than LMT's 2.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EADSY Airbus Group NV	1.87%	1.39%	1.90%	1.24%	1.39%	0.00%	1.84%	0.95%	1.45%	2.66%	4.45%	2.08%
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation	2.66%	2.76%	2.62%	2.68%	2.34%	2.98%	2.76%	2.31%	3.13%	2.32%	2.71%	2.83%

Financials

EADSY vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Airbus Group NV and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EADSY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbus Group NV reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 12.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

EADSY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbus Group NV reported an operating income of 190.08M and revenue of 12.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

EADSY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbus Group NV reported a net income of 595.64M and revenue of 12.86B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EADSY and LMT in my portfolio?

EADSY and LMT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EADSY or LMT?

EADSY has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to LMT (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EADSY dropped -81.67% vs LMT's -79.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.