EADSY vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Performance
EADSY vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EADSY vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADSY Airbus Group NV | -16.35% | 48.47% | 5.12% | 31.83% | -5.67% | 16.80% | -23.13% | 56.19% | -2.87% | 56.26% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 17.51% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Fundamentals
EADSY:
$153.28B
ET:
$69.42B
EADSY:
$1.65
ET:
$1.37
EADSY:
29.45
ET:
13.90
EADSY:
2.09
ET:
0.82
EADSY:
5.87
ET:
1.42
EADSY:
$73.18B
ET:
$82.63B
EADSY:
$10.93B
ET:
$18.01B
EADSY:
$9.46B
ET:
$14.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EADSY achieves a -16.35% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, EADSY has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 13.87%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.33% annualized return.
EADSY
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- -16.35%
- 6M
- -17.15%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
ET
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 29.13%
- 10Y*
- 20.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EADSY vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
EADSY
ET
EADSY vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 0.72 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.60 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.30 | 1.67 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 1.15 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.56 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.35 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between EADSY and ET is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EADSY vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
EADSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than ET's 6.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADSY Airbus Group NV | 1.66% | 1.39% | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 0.95% | 1.45% | 2.66% | 4.45% | 2.08% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.97% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Drawdowns
EADSY vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EADSY drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADSY and ET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.67% | -87.81% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -17.33% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.58% | -25.82% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.74% | -72.82% | +8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.40% | -3.30% | -21.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.49% | -25.95% | -16.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.38% | 6.24% | +3.14% |
Volatility
EADSY vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Airbus Group NV (EADSY) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.02%. This indicates that EADSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.25% | 5.02% | +7.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 11.78% | +8.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.14% | 23.83% | +7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 25.47% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 36.63% | -0.52% |
Financials
EADSY vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airbus Group NV and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EADSY vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
EADSY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Airbus Group NV reported a gross profit of 3.75B and revenue of 25.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.
EADSY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Airbus Group NV reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 25.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
EADSY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Airbus Group NV reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 25.74B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.