EADSY vs. ET
EADSY (Airbus Group NV) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. EADSY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, EADSY returned 14.44%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for ET. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EADSY vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EADSY achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 22.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EADSY has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 14.44%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.
EADSY
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -14.16%
- 6M
- -14.72%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
ET
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
EADSY vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADSY Airbus Group NV | -14.16% | 48.47% | 5.12% | 31.83% | -5.67% | 16.80% | -23.13% | 56.19% | -2.87% | 56.26% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 22.86% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EADSY and ET is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.28 |
The correlation between EADSY and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EADSY:
$153.94B
ET:
$67.59B
EADSY:
$1.58
ET:
$1.36
EADSY:
30.82
ET:
14.36
EADSY:
2.13
ET:
0.78
EADSY:
5.89
ET:
1.36
EADSY:
$72.49B
ET:
$89.38B
EADSY:
$10.64B
ET:
$20.48B
EADSY:
$8.44B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EADSY vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
EADSY
ET
EADSY vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 1.77 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.37 | 3.90 | -3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 1.09 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.89 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.36 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.36 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
EADSY vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EADSY drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADSY and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.67% | -87.81% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -10.02% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.47% | -24.56% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.58% | -25.82% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.74% | -72.82% | +8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.42% | -4.12% | -18.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -25.75% | -16.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.21% | 4.55% | +7.66% |
Volatility
EADSY vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Airbus Group NV (EADSY) has a higher volatility of 12.31% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.97%. This indicates that EADSY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EADSY | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.31% | 5.97% | +6.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.51% | 11.89% | +13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.48% | 16.42% | +14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 24.90% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.38% | 35.04% | +1.34% |
Dividends
EADSY vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
EADSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than ET's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EADSY Airbus Group NV | 1.92% | 1.39% | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 0.95% | 1.45% | 2.66% | 4.45% | 2.08% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.83% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
Financials
EADSY vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airbus Group NV and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EADSY vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
EADSY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbus Group NV reported a gross profit of 1.58B and revenue of 12.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
EADSY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbus Group NV reported an operating income of 190.08M and revenue of 12.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
EADSY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbus Group NV reported a net income of 595.64M and revenue of 12.86B, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EADSY and ET have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EADSY has higher volatility (12.31%) compared to ET (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EADSY dropped -81.67% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EADSY and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer