EADSY vs. ET

In the year-to-date period, EADSY achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, EADSY has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 10.70%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbus Group NV (EADSY) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EADSY Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EADSY and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EADSY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%.

The maximum EADSY drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EADSY and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Airbus Group NV (EADSY) is 15.24%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that EADSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airbus Group NV and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.