PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EA vs. BJK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EA and BJK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

EA vs. BJK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
154.37%
49.71%
EA
BJK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EA:

-0.41

BJK:

0.00

Sortino Ratio

EA:

-0.35

BJK:

0.13

Omega Ratio

EA:

0.94

BJK:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

EA:

-0.33

BJK:

0.00

Martin Ratio

EA:

-1.21

BJK:

0.00

Ulcer Index

EA:

8.41%

BJK:

7.28%

Daily Std Dev

EA:

25.12%

BJK:

18.83%

Max Drawdown

EA:

-84.24%

BJK:

-71.12%

Current Drawdown

EA:

-26.74%

BJK:

-23.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EA achieves a -15.99% return, which is significantly lower than BJK's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EA has outperformed BJK with an annualized return of 8.38%, while BJK has yielded a comparatively lower 3.06% annualized return.


EA

YTD

-15.99%

1M

-15.98%

6M

-17.22%

1Y

-9.58%

5Y*

3.29%

10Y*

8.38%

BJK

YTD

2.10%

1M

2.58%

6M

10.29%

1Y

-1.65%

5Y*

1.63%

10Y*

3.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EA vs. BJK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EA is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EA is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EA is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EA is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EA is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EA is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BJK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BJK is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BJK is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BJK is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BJK is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BJK is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BJK is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EA vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EA, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.410.00
The chart of Sortino ratio for EA, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.350.13
The chart of Omega ratio for EA, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.941.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for EA, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.330.00
The chart of Martin ratio for EA, currently valued at -1.21, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-1.210.00
EA
BJK

The current EA Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the BJK Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EA and BJK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.41
0.00
EA
BJK

Dividends

EA vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison

EA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than BJK's 2.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
0.62%0.52%0.56%0.61%0.52%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
2.82%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%4.90%

Drawdowns

EA vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EA drawdown since its inception was -84.24%, which is greater than BJK's maximum drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EA and BJK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-26.74%
-23.04%
EA
BJK

Volatility

EA vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison

Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) has a higher volatility of 19.11% compared to VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) at 4.61%. This indicates that EA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
19.11%
4.61%
EA
BJK
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab