DVSMX vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DVSMX (Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DVSMX returned 7.87%/yr vs 8.05%/yr for FCPGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DVSMX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FCPGX.

Performance

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVSMX achieves a 21.18% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 23.66% return.

DVSMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 21.18%
• 6M: 17.14%
• 1Y: 52.56%
• 3Y*: 24.83%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: —

FCPGX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 23.66%
• 6M: 19.72%
• 1Y: 42.05%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund	21.18%	16.66%	27.44%	18.93%	-34.12%	18.41%	63.95%	40.29%	-8.71%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	23.66%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DVSMX and FCPGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2018	0.95

The correlation between DVSMX and FCPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DVSMX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVSMX

DVSMX Risk / Return Rank: 66
DVSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DVSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DVSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DVSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DVSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVSMX	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	1.84	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	2.50	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.31	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	3.12	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.48	12.42	+0.07

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVSMX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVSMX drawdown since its inception was -47.64%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVSMX and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVSMX	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.64%	-59.11%	+11.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.39%	-13.12%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.77%	-28.69%	-6.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.64%	-39.04%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-1.28%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.12%	-10.67%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	3.29%	+0.85%

Volatility

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 8.05%. This indicates that DVSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVSMX	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	8.05%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.28%	17.32%	+3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.90%	22.26%	+4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.09%	23.69%	+5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.54%	22.92%	+6.62%

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVSMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

DVSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than FCPGX's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund	0.17%	0.21%	1.08%	0.38%	2.15%	17.58%	6.55%	6.34%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.16%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVSMX and FCPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DVSMX and FCPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DVSMX or FCPGX?

DVSMX has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to FCPGX (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVSMX dropped -47.64% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DVSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.