DVSMX vs. FCPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX).
DVSMX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Aug 21, 2017. FCPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DVSMX or FCPGX.
Key characteristics
| DVSMX | FCPGX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 41.00% | 31.12% |
| 1Y Return | 63.32% | 54.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -5.93% | 0.88% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.89% | 7.27% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.98 | 2.87 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.76 | 3.76 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.31 | 1.40 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.14 | 17.56 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.81% | 3.24% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.97% | 19.85% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.84% | -59.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -18.34% | -8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVSMX and FCPGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DVSMX achieves a 41.00% return, which is significantly higher than FCPGX's 31.12% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVSMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison
DVSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than FCPGX's 0.77% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.32% | 8.37% | 16.99% |
Drawdowns
DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVSMX drawdown since its inception was -53.84%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVSMX and FCPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DVSMX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) at 5.73%. This indicates that DVSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.