DUSLX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
DUSLX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 20, 2012. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
DUSLX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DUSLX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSLX DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio | -4.21% | 12.62% | 23.82% | 24.97% | -15.58% | 26.43% | 21.83% | 32.17% | -1.98% | 25.05% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.97% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSLX achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, DUSLX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.03%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.75% annualized return.
DUSLX
- 1D
- 3.02%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -5.80%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DUSLX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSLX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DUSLX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
DUSLX
VONG
DUSLX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUSLX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.36 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.22 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | 4.16 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUSLX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.59 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.84 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSLX and VONG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DUSLX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
DUSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSLX DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.02% | 1.84% | 8.37% | 6.98% | 1.42% | 2.41% | 4.65% | 1.36% | 1.72% | 1.69% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
DUSLX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSLX drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSLX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSLX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -32.72% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -16.23% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -32.72% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.86% | -32.72% | +1.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -12.29% | +5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -4.90% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 4.78% | -2.08% |
Volatility
DUSLX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) is 5.57%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that DUSLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DUSLX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 6.81% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 12.37% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.54% | 22.42% | -4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 21.35% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 20.82% | -3.63% |