PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUSLX vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUSLX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DUSLX has outperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 15.54%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.53% annualized return.


DUSLX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.18%
YTD
9.40%
6M
9.29%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
15.54%

MOAT

1D
-0.75%
1M
3.92%
YTD
0.44%
6M
1.97%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DUSLX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio
9.40%12.62%23.82%24.97%-15.58%26.43%21.83%32.17%-1.98%25.05%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
0.44%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSLX and MOAT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.83

The correlation between DUSLX and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUSLX vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSLX
DUSLX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DUSLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUSLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUSLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DUSLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUSLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUSLXMOATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.68

1.29

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.44

1.92

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.22

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.42

+0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.35

4.45

+4.90

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUSLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSLX and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUSLXMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.29

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.47

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.73

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.78

+0.15

Drawdowns

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSLX drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSLX and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUSLXMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.86%

-33.31%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-12.43%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.15%

-21.44%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

-23.96%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.86%

-33.31%

+2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.39%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-3.83%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.97%

-1.77%

Volatility

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) is 2.78%, while VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that DUSLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUSLXMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.61%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.79%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

13.78%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

18.17%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

18.68%

-1.47%

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSLX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUSLX vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

DUSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than MOAT's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUSLX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio
0.82%0.88%1.02%1.84%8.37%6.98%1.42%2.41%4.65%1.36%1.72%1.69%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.35%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUSLX and MOAT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to DUSLX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSLX dropped -30.86% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

DUSLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUSLX and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer