DUSLX vs. DFSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX).
DUSLX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 20, 2012. DFSIX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 12, 2008.
Performance
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSLX DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio | -7.03% | 12.62% | 23.82% | 24.97% | -15.58% | 26.43% | 21.83% | 32.17% | -1.98% | 25.05% |
DFSIX DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio | -8.15% | 15.92% | 23.19% | 25.70% | -17.85% | 27.38% | 21.25% | 32.52% | -6.72% | 20.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSLX achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly higher than DFSIX's -8.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DUSLX having a 13.69% annualized return and DFSIX not far behind at 13.25%.
DUSLX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.87%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
DFSIX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DUSLX and DFSIX have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DUSLX vs. DFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
DUSLX
DFSIX
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUSLX | DFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.71 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 1.13 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.16 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.23 | 2.99 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUSLX | DFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.71 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.56 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.54 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSLX and DFSIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Dividend Comparison
DUSLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, which matches DFSIX's 0.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSLX DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.97% | 0.88% | 1.02% | 1.84% | 8.37% | 6.98% | 1.42% | 2.41% | 4.65% | 1.36% | 1.72% | 1.69% |
DFSIX DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio | 0.97% | 0.88% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 2.13% | 1.19% | 2.02% | 2.31% | 1.92% | 1.85% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSLX drawdown since its inception was -30.86%, smaller than the maximum DFSIX drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSLX and DFSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSLX | DFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.86% | -53.77% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.76% | -12.65% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -25.16% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.86% | -35.68% | +4.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.48% | -10.36% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -6.95% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.02% | -0.35% |
Volatility
DUSLX vs. DFSIX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Large Cap Growth Portfolio (DUSLX) and DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DUSLX | DFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 4.57% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 9.33% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 18.82% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 17.52% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 18.24% | -1.08% |