DUSB vs. BOXX

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DUSB having a 1.84% return and BOXX slightly lower at 1.81%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DUSB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DUSB Sharpe Ratio is 8.55, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 13.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSB and BOXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

DUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than BOXX's 0.26% yield.

The maximum DUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.29%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSB and BOXX.

Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) have volatilities of 0.09% and 0.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.