DURPX vs. VOOG
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG).
DURPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on May 16, 2017. VOOG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2019.
Performance
DURPX vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DURPX vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | -2.70% | 12.81% | 20.49% | 21.85% | -11.82% | 25.27% | 19.29% | 33.11% | -5.11% | 17.77% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | -6.97% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 33.35% | 30.93% | -0.21% | 13.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's -6.97% return.
DURPX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -5.64%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
VOOG
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- YTD
- -6.97%
- 6M
- -5.29%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DURPX vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DURPX vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank
DURPX
VOOG
DURPX vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DURPX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 1.05 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.62 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 1.76 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.01 | 6.81 | -1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DURPX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 1.05 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.84 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DURPX and VOOG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DURPX vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, more than VOOG's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DURPX DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.49% | 3.65% | 4.12% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.53% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Drawdowns
DURPX vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum VOOG drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and VOOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DURPX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | -32.73% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -13.71% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.90% | -32.73% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -9.07% | +2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -5.01% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.54% | -0.90% |
Volatility
DURPX vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) is 4.95%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that DURPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DURPX | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 7.28% | -2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.82% | 12.68% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 22.28% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 21.16% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 20.65% | -2.96% |