DTM vs. UMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI).

UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021.

Performance

DTM vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DTM vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DTM DT Midstream, Inc.	12.58%	24.13%	88.95%	4.71%	20.73%	17.18%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	18.78%	5.11%	42.97%	14.60%	20.78%	-0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTM achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than UMI's 18.78% return.

DTM

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -4.74%
• YTD: 12.58%
• 6M: 18.95%
• 1Y: 40.45%
• 3Y*: 45.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMI

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 18.78%
• 6M: 17.63%
• 1Y: 17.50%
• 3Y*: 26.90%
• 5Y*: 23.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DTM vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTM

DTM Risk / Return Rank: 85
DTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DTM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DTM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

UMI

UMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 52
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTM vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTM	UMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	0.99	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.31	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.21	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	1.25	+2.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	4.13	+6.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTM vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTM and UMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTM	UMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	0.99	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.62	+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between DTM and UMI is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DTM vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

DTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than UMI's 6.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTM DT Midstream, Inc.	2.49%	2.74%	2.96%	5.04%	4.63%	2.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF	6.07%	6.23%	4.39%	4.67%	4.36%	3.00%	2.18%	2.47%	2.48%	0.15%

Drawdowns

DTM vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTM drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTM and UMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTM	UMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.56%	-48.08%	+24.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-14.76%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.39%	-3.39%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-6.67%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	4.47%	-0.58%

Volatility

DTM vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) at 4.10%. This indicates that DTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTM	UMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.21%	4.10%	+4.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.74%	9.89%	+4.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	17.84%	+6.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.60%	20.47%	+5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.60%	23.29%	+2.31%