PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTE vs. CMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DTE vs. CMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DTE Energy Company (DTE) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTE achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than CMS's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, DTE has outperformed CMS with an annualized return of 9.58%, while CMS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.30% annualized return.


DTE

1D
-0.59%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
10.81%
6M
8.29%
1Y
8.11%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
9.58%

CMS

1D
-2.27%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
1.95%
6M
-1.24%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
8.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTE vs. CMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTE
DTE Energy Company
10.81%10.42%13.49%-2.81%1.23%19.35%-2.86%21.38%4.21%14.59%
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
1.95%8.13%18.60%-5.21%0.84%9.71%-0.32%30.04%8.25%17.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DTE and CMS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1985

0.53

Over the past year, DTE and CMS have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

DTE:

$4.92

CMS:

$4.92

PE Ratio

DTE:

28.84

CMS:

14.27

PS Ratio

DTE:

1.80

CMS:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

DTE:

$16.33B

CMS:

$8.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DTE:

$9.07B

CMS:

$4.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

DTE:

$4.15B

CMS:

$3.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTE vs. CMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTE
DTE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CMS
CMS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTE vs. CMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DTE Energy Company (DTE) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTECMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.03

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.18

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

0.49

+1.38

DTE vs. CMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTE Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the CMS Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTE and CMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTECMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.13

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.30

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.40

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.34

+0.01

Drawdowns

DTE vs. CMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTE drawdown since its inception was -67.92%, smaller than the maximum CMS drawdown of -91.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTE and CMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTECMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.92%

-91.20%

+23.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

-11.48%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-19.61%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.93%

-27.56%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-29.55%

-12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.51%

-11.48%

+4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-27.36%

+10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

4.16%

+0.18%

Volatility

DTE vs. CMS - Volatility Comparison

DTE Energy Company (DTE) and CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) have volatilities of 5.91% and 5.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTECMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

5.86%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

11.98%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

15.93%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.80%

18.96%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

20.68%

+1.62%

Dividends

DTE vs. CMS - Dividend Comparison

DTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, which matches CMS's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
3.17%3.10%3.09%3.36%3.62%2.67%2.67%2.43%2.88%2.81%2.98%3.22%
DTE
DTE Energy Company
3.18%3.44%3.44%3.52%3.07%2.98%3.40%2.96%3.26%3.07%3.10%3.54%

Financials

DTE vs. CMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DTE Energy Company and CMS Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
5.14B
2.73B
(DTE) Total Revenue
(CMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DTE vs. CMS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DTE Energy Company and CMS Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
85.7%
0
Portfolio components
DTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DTE Energy Company reported a gross profit of 4.41B and revenue of 5.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.7%.

CMS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DTE Energy Company reported an operating income of 412.00M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

CMS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 490.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.

DTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DTE Energy Company reported a net income of 1.19M and revenue of 5.14B, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

CMS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMS Energy Corporation reported a net income of 340.00M and revenue of 2.73B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DTE and CMS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTE has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to CMS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTE dropped -67.92% vs CMS's -91.20%.

DTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTE and CMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer