DTCPX vs. FSHBX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio (DTCPX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX).
DTCPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on May 20, 2015. FSHBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 15, 1986.
Performance
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCPX DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio | -0.07% | 4.58% | 5.57% | 6.04% | -7.30% | -0.22% | 2.70% | 6.45% | 0.75% | 2.22% |
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | -0.08% | 5.49% | 4.73% | 5.35% | -3.86% | -0.92% | 3.59% | 4.20% | 1.21% | 1.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTCPX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than FSHBX's -0.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DTCPX having a 2.08% annualized return and FSHBX not far ahead at 2.10%.
DTCPX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 3.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTCPX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHBX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DTCPX vs. FSHBX — Risk / Return Rank
DTCPX
FSHBX
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio (DTCPX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTCPX | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 1.81 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.31 | 3.13 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.42 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.48 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 13.53 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTCPX | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 1.81 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.00 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.49 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between DTCPX and FSHBX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Dividend Comparison
DTCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, less than FSHBX's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCPX DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio | 3.78% | 3.34% | 3.64% | 3.23% | 1.75% | 1.67% | 1.27% | 2.73% | 3.12% | 1.91% | 2.18% | 0.00% |
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 3.88% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTCPX drawdown since its inception was -10.78%, which is greater than FSHBX's maximum drawdown of -8.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTCPX and FSHBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTCPX | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -8.80% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.44% | -1.17% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.78% | -6.36% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.78% | -6.51% | -4.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -0.82% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -1.05% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 0.30% | +0.02% |
Volatility
DTCPX vs. FSHBX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Targeted Credit Portfolio (DTCPX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) at 0.60%. This indicates that DTCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DTCPX | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.60% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 1.32% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45% | 2.07% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.33% | 2.18% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 1.84% | +0.23% |