PortfoliosLab logo
DT vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between DT and ASML is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

DT vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DT:

0.30

ASML:

-0.33

Sortino Ratio

DT:

0.63

ASML:

-0.14

Omega Ratio

DT:

1.08

ASML:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

DT:

0.18

ASML:

-0.34

Martin Ratio

DT:

0.72

ASML:

-0.53

Ulcer Index

DT:

12.27%

ASML:

29.34%

Daily Std Dev

DT:

33.35%

ASML:

48.75%

Max Drawdown

DT:

-61.77%

ASML:

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

DT:

-35.83%

ASML:

-29.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DT:

$15.11B

ASML:

$294.98B

EPS

DT:

$1.60

ASML:

$25.00

PE Ratio

DT:

31.55

ASML:

30.01

PEG Ratio

DT:

1.01

ASML:

1.36

PS Ratio

DT:

9.25

ASML:

9.60

PB Ratio

DT:

5.92

ASML:

13.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

DT:

$1.25B

ASML:

$30.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DT:

$1.01B

ASML:

$15.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

DT:

$174.70M

ASML:

$11.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DT achieves a -7.01% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 10.77% return.


DT

YTD

-7.01%

1M

17.23%

6M

-5.46%

1Y

10.06%

5Y*

8.94%

10Y*

N/A

ASML

YTD

10.77%

1M

14.54%

6M

14.72%

1Y

-15.95%

5Y*

21.53%

10Y*

22.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DT vs. ASML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DT is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DT is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DT is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DT is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DT is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DT is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASML is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASML is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASML is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASML is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASML is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASML is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DT vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DT Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DT and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

DT vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

DT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DT
Dynatrace, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.91%0.97%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.77%

Drawdowns

DT vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DT drawdown since its inception was -61.77%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DT and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DT vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) is 7.21%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 12.08%. This indicates that DT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

DT vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dynatrace, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
436.17M
7.74B
(DT) Total Revenue
(ASML) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DT vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dynatrace, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
81.1%
54.0%
(DT) Gross Margin
(ASML) Gross Margin
DT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a gross profit of 353.61M and revenue of 436.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.1%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.18B and revenue of 7.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

DT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Dynatrace, Inc. reported an operating income of 47.46M and revenue of 436.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.74B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

DT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Dynatrace, Inc. reported a net income of 361.75M and revenue of 436.17M, resulting in a net margin of 82.9%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.36B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.