PortfoliosLab logo
DSCPX vs. IWM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DSCPX and IWM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DSCPX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davenport Small Cap Focus Fund (DSCPX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

DSCPX:

17.58%

IWM:

24.05%

Max Drawdown

DSCPX:

-0.90%

IWM:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

DSCPX:

0.00%

IWM:

-16.73%

Returns By Period


DSCPX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IWM

YTD

-8.92%

1M

8.92%

6M

-15.23%

1Y

-0.59%

5Y*

11.03%

10Y*

6.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DSCPX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSCPX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DSCPX vs. IWM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSCPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DSCPX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DSCPX is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DSCPX is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DSCPX is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DSCPX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DSCPX is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWM is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWM is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWM is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWM is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWM is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DSCPX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davenport Small Cap Focus Fund (DSCPX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

DSCPX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

DSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IWM's 1.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DSCPX
Davenport Small Cap Focus Fund
0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
1.23%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%1.26%

Drawdowns

DSCPX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSCPX drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCPX and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DSCPX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...