DSCGX vs. FCPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX).
DSCGX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Dec 20, 2012. FCPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DSCGX or FCPGX.
Key characteristics
| DSCGX | FCPGX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.55% | 29.08% |
| 1Y Return | 39.77% | 52.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.56% | 0.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.60% | 6.86% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.70% | 7.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.21 | 2.64 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.09 | 3.50 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.46 | 1.29 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.26 | 16.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.00% | 3.25% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.98% | 19.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.44% | -59.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.22% | -9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSCGX and FCPGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DSCGX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DSCGX achieves a 21.55% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 29.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DSCGX has outperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 10.70%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DSCGX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSCGX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DSCGX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DSCGX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison
DSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FCPGX's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSCGX DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.63% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 0.72% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 0.63% | 1.19% |
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.32% | 8.37% | 16.99% |
Drawdowns
DSCGX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSCGX drawdown since its inception was -41.44%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSCGX and FCPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DSCGX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DSCGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) have volatilities of 5.94% and 6.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.