PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRSK vs. IEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRSK vs. IEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRSK achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than IEF's -0.66% return.


DRSK

1D
-0.81%
1M
3.02%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.13%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*

IEF

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-1.14%
10Y*
0.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRSK vs. IEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.75%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.66%8.03%-0.63%3.64%-15.15%-3.33%10.01%8.03%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DRSK and IEF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018

0.37

The correlation between DRSK and IEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRSK vs. IEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IEF
IEF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEF Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRSK vs. IEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) and iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRSKIEFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.85

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

1.29

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.00

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

2.98

+0.02

DRSK vs. IEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRSK Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the IEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRSK and IEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRSKIEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.85

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.15

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.50

+0.30

Drawdowns

DRSK vs. IEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRSK drawdown since its inception was -19.87%, smaller than the maximum IEF drawdown of -23.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRSK and IEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSKIEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.87%

-23.93%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-4.07%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.60%

-7.74%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-21.40%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-11.35%

+10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-5.34%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.37%

+1.42%

Volatility

DRSK vs. IEF - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (IEF) at 1.54%. This indicates that DRSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSKIEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

1.54%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

3.34%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.26%

4.78%

+3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

7.71%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.06%

6.62%

+0.44%

DRSK vs. IEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRSK has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IEF's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRSK vs. IEF - Dividend Comparison

DRSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than IEF's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.63%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEF
iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.90%3.77%3.62%2.91%1.96%0.83%1.08%2.08%2.24%1.82%1.81%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRSK and IEF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRSK has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to IEF (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRSK dropped -19.87% vs IEF's -23.93%.

On 5-year performance, DRSK leads with 3.06% vs -1.14% for IEF. On fees, IEF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IEF has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DRSK has performed better with a 3.06% return vs -1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DRSK.

IEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.63% for DRSK.

DRSK is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IEF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DRSK and 0.15% for IEF.

DRSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRSK and IEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer