PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DQ vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DQ vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DQ achieves a -45.56% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DQ has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 13.45%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.66% annualized return.


DQ

1D
-4.40%
1M
-19.50%
YTD
-45.56%
6M
-50.45%
1Y
18.44%
3Y*
-25.19%
5Y*
-27.62%
10Y*
13.45%

LLY

1D
1.37%
1M
11.64%
YTD
0.72%
6M
4.73%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
32.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DQ vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.
-45.56%51.75%-26.92%-31.11%-4.24%-29.71%460.16%118.80%-60.63%207.98%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.72%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DQ and LLY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2010

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DQ:

$1.09B

LLY:

$966.48B

EPS

DQ:

-$2.78

LLY:

$28.14

PS Ratio

DQ:

1.91

LLY:

13.41

PB Ratio

DQ:

0.25

LLY:

30.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

DQ:

$568.81M

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DQ:

-$195.95M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

DQ:

-$101.58M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DQ vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DQ
DQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DQ vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DQLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

1.90

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.72

4.73

-4.01

DQ vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DQ and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DQLLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

1.19

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

1.26

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

1.09

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.57

-0.54

Drawdowns

DQ vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DQ drawdown since its inception was -94.98%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DQ and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DQLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.98%

-68.24%

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.00%

-23.64%

-31.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.13%

-34.48%

-35.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.24%

-34.48%

-49.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.74%

-34.48%

-55.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.06%

-4.26%

-82.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.88%

-19.22%

-41.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.70%

9.49%

+16.21%

Volatility

DQ vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Daqo New Energy Corp. (DQ) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.16%. This indicates that DQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DQLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

9.16%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.16%

26.81%

+10.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.12%

37.88%

+30.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.28%

32.79%

+37.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.76%

30.14%

+43.62%

Dividends

DQ vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

DQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DQ
Daqo New Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.60%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%

Financials

DQ vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Daqo New Energy Corp. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
26.72M
19.80B
(DQ) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


DQ and LLY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DQ has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to LLY (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DQ dropped -94.98% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DQ and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer