PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DPST vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DPST vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DPST achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DPST has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -14.98%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


DPST

1D
-7.03%
1M
-6.52%
YTD
4.97%
6M
6.73%
1Y
37.91%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
-26.61%
10Y*
-14.98%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DPST vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
4.97%-5.90%15.48%-55.79%-54.10%108.31%-76.53%70.65%-56.75%7.28%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DPST and TQQQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015

0.39

The correlation between DPST and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DPST vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DPST
TQQQ

Financial Services

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

DPST
100.0%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

DPST

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

DPST

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DPST

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

DPST

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

DPST

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

DPST

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

DPST

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

DPST

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

DPST

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

DPST

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DPST vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DPST
DPST Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
DPST Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DPST Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DPST vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DPSTTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

3.75

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

12.27

-10.16

DPST vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DPST Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DPST and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DPSTTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.92

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.43

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.69

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.74

-0.91

Drawdowns

DPST vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DPST drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DPST and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DPSTTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.73%

-81.66%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.44%

-36.97%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.38%

-58.04%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.99%

-81.66%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.73%

-81.66%

-16.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.57%

-0.76%

-92.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.12%

-18.52%

-45.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.04%

11.28%

+6.76%

Volatility

DPST vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares (DPST) has a higher volatility of 17.99% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that DPST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DPSTTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.99%

13.29%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.46%

36.04%

+11.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.35%

47.60%

+21.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.36%

66.53%

+22.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.57%

65.96%

+28.61%

DPST vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DPST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DPST vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DPST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DPST
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares
2.01%2.18%1.55%1.78%1.51%0.58%0.90%1.29%2.18%0.30%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DPST and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DPST has higher volatility (17.99%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DPST dropped -97.73% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -14.98% for DPST. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DPST.

DPST has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

DPST tracks Solactive US Regional Banks Total Return Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DPST and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DPST and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer