DOG vs. SDOW
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and SDOW (ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while SDOW is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DOG returned -11.50%/yr vs -38.68%/yr for SDOW. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DOG vs. SDOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -5.82% return, which is significantly higher than SDOW's -20.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has outperformed SDOW with an annualized return of -11.50%, while SDOW has yielded a comparatively lower -38.68% annualized return.
DOG
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -5.82%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- 1Y
- -15.17%
- 3Y*
- -8.99%
- 5Y*
- -6.11%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
SDOW
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -20.67%
- 6M
- -18.99%
- 1Y
- -44.96%
- 3Y*
- -33.84%
- 5Y*
- -26.47%
- 10Y*
- -38.68%
DOG vs. SDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -5.82% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | -20.67% | -33.94% | -25.95% | -28.78% | 4.00% | -49.00% | -66.48% | -49.54% | -0.30% | -52.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and SDOW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.99 |
The correlation between DOG and SDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOG vs. SDOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOG
SDOW
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DOG
SDOW
Basic Materials
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Communication Services
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Consumer Cyclical
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Consumer Defensive
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Energy
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Healthcare
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Industrials
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Real Estate
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Technology
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Utilities
DOG
-
SDOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. SDOW — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
SDOW
DOG vs. SDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOG | SDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.79 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.02 | -1.01 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | -1.65 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOG vs. SDOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.79%, smaller than the maximum SDOW drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and SDOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | SDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.79% | -99.96% | +7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -44.49% | +29.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -75.55% | +45.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.86% | -83.15% | +48.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.17% | -99.29% | +28.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.74% | -99.96% | +7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -89.58% | +23.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | 29.05% | -19.62% |
Volatility
DOG vs. SDOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 4.17%, while ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 (SDOW) has a volatility of 12.43%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | SDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 12.43% | -8.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 29.43% | -19.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 37.23% | -24.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 44.43% | -29.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 52.23% | -34.71% |
DOG vs. SDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DOG and SDOW have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DOG vs. SDOW - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than SDOW's 5.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.55% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
SDOW ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30 | 5.87% | 5.80% | 8.30% | 5.38% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.17% | 1.23% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, DOG and SDOW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SDOW has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to DOG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.79% vs SDOW's -99.96%.
On 10-year performance, DOG leads with -11.50% vs -38.68% for SDOW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DOG has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -38.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG and SDOW have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SDOW has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 3.55% for DOG.
DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SDOW is Leveraged Equities. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while SDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (-300%).
SDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.21 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and SDOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer