PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DNUT vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNUT achieves a -14.18% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return.


DNUT

1D
-1.43%
1M
5.50%
YTD
-14.18%
6M
-17.66%
1Y
31.68%
3Y*
-37.12%
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-9.86%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
41.43%
6M
35.75%
1Y
100.69%
3Y*
58.02%
5Y*
21.47%
10Y*
45.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DNUT
Krispy Kreme, Inc.
-14.18%-59.02%-33.44%47.72%-44.93%16.39%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
41.43%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%35.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DNUT and TQQQ is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.28

The correlation between DNUT and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DNUT vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNUT
DNUT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DNUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNUT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DNUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DNUTTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

2.74

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

8.72

-7.26

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNUT and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNUT drawdown since its inception was -87.18%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNUT and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DNUTTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.18%

-81.66%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.87%

-36.97%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.87%

-58.04%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.80%

-14.65%

-68.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.78%

-18.49%

-29.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.77%

11.59%

+10.18%

Volatility

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) is 18.32%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that DNUT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DNUTTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

27.27%

-8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.97%

43.35%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.10%

53.39%

+19.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.55%

67.41%

-7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.55%

66.32%

-6.77%

Dividends

DNUT vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DNUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNUT
Krispy Kreme, Inc.
0.00%1.74%1.41%0.93%1.36%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.42%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DNUT and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to DNUT (18.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DNUT dropped -87.18% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DNUT and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer