DNOPY vs. XLG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG).

XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005.

Performance

DNOPY vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DNOPY vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A	-22.38%	19.79%	-16.65%	30.68%	2.43%	10.75%	89.61%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	-7.18%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	29.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DNOPY achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's -7.18% return.

DNOPY

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -19.46%
• YTD: -22.38%
• 6M: -24.20%
• 1Y: -22.27%
• 3Y*: -1.22%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -7.18%
• 6M: -4.55%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DNOPY vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DNOPY

DNOPY Risk / Return Rank: 20
DNOPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
DNOPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
DNOPY Omega Ratio Rank: 19
DNOPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
DNOPY Martin Ratio Rank: 20

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DNOPY vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DNOPY	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	0.99	-1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.47	1.54	-2.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.22	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	1.63	-2.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	5.71	-6.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DNOPY vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNOPY Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNOPY and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DNOPY	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51	0.99	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.75	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.59	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between DNOPY and XLG is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DNOPY vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

DNOPY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DNOPY Dino Polska S.A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.70%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Drawdowns

DNOPY vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNOPY drawdown since its inception was -47.79%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNOPY and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DNOPY	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.79%	-52.39%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.61%	-12.41%	-30.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.79%	-28.02%	-19.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.50%	-8.93%	-31.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.51%	-7.69%	-5.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.44%	3.54%	+15.90%

Volatility

DNOPY vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Dino Polska S.A (DNOPY) has a higher volatility of 28.05% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.82%. This indicates that DNOPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DNOPY	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.05%	5.82%	+22.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.26%	10.65%	+26.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.93%	19.97%	+23.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.31%	18.68%	+39.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.32%	18.81%	+41.51%