PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DNN vs. RYCEY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


DNNRYCEY
YTD Return15.25%96.56%
1Y Return28.30%163.48%
3Y Return (Ann)1.18%57.93%
5Y Return (Ann)35.46%13.63%
10Y Return (Ann)5.55%4.03%
Sharpe Ratio0.555.14
Sortino Ratio1.175.35
Omega Ratio1.141.68
Calmar Ratio0.352.61
Martin Ratio1.7550.41
Ulcer Index17.11%3.32%
Daily Std Dev54.37%32.58%
Max Drawdown-98.06%-91.67%
Current Drawdown-80.19%-5.26%

Fundamentals


DNNRYCEY
Market Cap$1.83B$61.83B
EPS$0.05$0.36
PE Ratio40.8020.19
PEG Ratio0.000.59
Total Revenue (TTM)-$3.33M$17.82B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$24.63M$4.05B
EBITDA (TTM)-$36.55M$3.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between DNN and RYCEY is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

DNN vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 96.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DNN has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 5.55%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 4.03% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
42.34%
DNN
RYCEY

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DNN vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DNN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DNN, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DNN, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DNN, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DNN, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DNN, currently valued at 1.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.75
RYCEY
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 5.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.005.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 5.35, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.35
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.68
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RYCEY, currently valued at 50.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0050.41

DNN vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 5.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and RYCEY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.55
5.14
DNN
RYCEY

Dividends

DNN vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

Neither DNN nor RYCEY has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
DNN
Denison Mines Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%128.87%1.68%1.50%1.29%1.96%4.08%2.74%1.50%

Drawdowns

DNN vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.06%, which is greater than RYCEY's maximum drawdown of -91.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and RYCEY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-80.19%
-5.26%
DNN
RYCEY

Volatility

DNN vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 8.23%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.49%
8.23%
DNN
RYCEY

Financials

DNN vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Denison Mines Corp. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items