DNN vs. RYCEY

In the year-to-date period, DNN achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, DNN has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 7.55%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 3.52% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DNN Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DNN and RYCEY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither DNN nor RYCEY has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum DNN drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than RYCEY's maximum drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DNN and RYCEY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) has a higher volatility of 19.16% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 6.49%. This indicates that DNN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Denison Mines Corp. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.