DMXF vs. USXF
DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) and USXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while USXF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMXF returned 6.83%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for USXF. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DMXF charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USXF.
Performance
DMXF vs. USXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than USXF's 20.76% return.
DMXF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
USXF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 10.32%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- 35.21%
- 3Y*
- 27.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- —
DMXF vs. USXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.52% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 23.13% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 20.76% | 16.97% | 26.16% | 31.65% | -21.20% | 27.14% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMXF and USXF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between DMXF and USXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMXF vs. USXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMXF
USXF
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
DMXF
USXF
Technology
DMXF
USXF
Industrials
DMXF
USXF
Healthcare
DMXF
USXF
Communication Services
DMXF
USXF
Basic Materials
DMXF
USXF
Consumer Cyclical
DMXF
USXF
Real Estate
DMXF
USXF
Consumer Defensive
DMXF
USXF
Utilities
DMXF
USXF
Energy
DMXF
-
USXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMXF vs. USXF — Risk / Return Rank
DMXF
USXF
DMXF vs. USXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMXF | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 2.20 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.95 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.47 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 13.97 | -7.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMXF | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 2.20 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.81 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
DMXF vs. USXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than USXF's maximum drawdown of -29.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and USXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMXF | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -29.54% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -10.19% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -20.93% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | -29.54% | -4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.51% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -6.42% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.53% | +0.62% |
Volatility
DMXF vs. USXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 5.13%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF (USXF) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMXF | USXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.41% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.29% | 12.82% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 16.13% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 19.55% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 19.18% | -1.93% |
DMXF vs. USXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than USXF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DMXF vs. USXF - Dividend Comparison
DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than USXF's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.35% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% |
USXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI USA ETF | 0.80% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.86% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMXF and USXF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USXF has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs USXF's -29.54%.
On 5-year performance, USXF leads with 15.70% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, USXF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USXF has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USXF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DMXF.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.80% for USXF.
DMXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while USXF is Large Cap Growth Equities. DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while USXF tracks MSCI USA Choice ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.10% for USXF.
USXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMXF and USXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer