DMAT vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
DMAT and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both DMAT and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DMAT or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between DMAT and VOO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DMAT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DMAT:
0.10
VOO:
1.87
DMAT:
0.37
VOO:
2.50
DMAT:
1.04
VOO:
1.35
DMAT:
0.06
VOO:
2.80
DMAT:
0.24
VOO:
11.95
DMAT:
13.43%
VOO:
1.98%
DMAT:
33.07%
VOO:
12.73%
DMAT:
-52.46%
VOO:
-33.99%
DMAT:
-44.45%
VOO:
-4.03%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAT achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -0.79% return.
DMAT
2.76%
-4.16%
-3.59%
2.65%
N/A
N/A
VOO
-0.79%
-3.48%
4.23%
23.66%
13.95%
13.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMAT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DMAT vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DMAT
VOO
DMAT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DMAT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VOO's 1.25% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF | 1.03% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
DMAT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAT drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DMAT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.65%. This indicates that DMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.