DMAT vs. REMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX).
DMAT and REMX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REMX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2010. Both DMAT and REMX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DMAT or REMX.
Correlation
The correlation between DMAT and REMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DMAT vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DMAT:
0.10
REMX:
-0.65
DMAT:
0.37
REMX:
-0.80
DMAT:
1.04
REMX:
0.91
DMAT:
0.06
REMX:
-0.28
DMAT:
0.24
REMX:
-1.20
DMAT:
13.43%
REMX:
19.61%
DMAT:
33.07%
REMX:
36.26%
DMAT:
-52.46%
REMX:
-90.21%
DMAT:
-44.45%
REMX:
-81.55%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAT achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 5.23% return.
DMAT
2.76%
-4.16%
-3.59%
2.65%
N/A
N/A
REMX
5.23%
-1.52%
-5.48%
-22.34%
1.11%
-2.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMAT vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DMAT and REMX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DMAT vs. REMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DMAT
REMX
DMAT vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DMAT vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
DMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than REMX's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAT Global X Disruptive Materials ETF | 1.03% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 2.43% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.60% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
DMAT vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAT drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAT and REMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DMAT vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) have volatilities of 6.79% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.