PortfoliosLab logo
DMAT vs. REMX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DMAT and REMX is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

DMAT vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

DMAT:

18.28%

REMX:

35.97%

Max Drawdown

DMAT:

-1.70%

REMX:

-90.21%

Current Drawdown

DMAT:

-1.70%

REMX:

-82.50%

Returns By Period


DMAT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

REMX

YTD

-0.23%

1M

6.63%

6M

-16.66%

1Y

-26.87%

5Y*

6.74%

10Y*

-3.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DMAT vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DMAT and REMX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

DMAT vs. REMX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DMAT is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DMAT is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DMAT is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DMAT is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DMAT is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DMAT is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of REMX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of REMX is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of REMX is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of REMX is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of REMX is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of REMX is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DMAT vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

DMAT vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

DMAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
2.56%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.60%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%1.53%

Drawdowns

DMAT vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAT drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAT and REMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

DMAT vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...