DMAT vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
DMAT and LIT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. Both DMAT and LIT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DMAT or LIT.
Correlation
The correlation between DMAT and LIT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DMAT vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DMAT:
0.10
LIT:
-0.40
DMAT:
0.37
LIT:
-0.40
DMAT:
1.04
LIT:
0.96
DMAT:
0.06
LIT:
-0.21
DMAT:
0.24
LIT:
-1.01
DMAT:
13.43%
LIT:
13.08%
DMAT:
33.07%
LIT:
32.77%
DMAT:
-52.46%
LIT:
-62.61%
DMAT:
-44.45%
LIT:
-56.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAT achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -0.61% return.
DMAT
2.76%
-4.16%
-3.59%
2.65%
N/A
N/A
LIT
-0.61%
-7.09%
0.36%
-12.60%
7.33%
7.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMAT vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DMAT vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DMAT
LIT
DMAT vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DMAT vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
DMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than LIT's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAT Global X Disruptive Materials ETF | 1.03% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
DMAT vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAT drawdown since its inception was -52.46%, smaller than the maximum LIT drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAT and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DMAT vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 6.00%. This indicates that DMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.