DM vs. CRWD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Desktop Metal, Inc. (DM) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD).

Performance

DM vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Desktop Metal, Inc. (DM) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DM vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DM Desktop Metal, Inc.	0.00%	111.97%	-68.84%	-44.78%	-72.53%	-71.22%	72.34%	2.89%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	-16.71%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) DM : $168.28M CRWD : $4.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) DM : -$20.94M CRWD : $3.60B
EBITDA (TTM) DM : -$244.18M CRWD : -$39.16M

Returns By Period

DM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWD

• 1D: 2.72%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: -16.71%
• 6M: -20.39%
• 1Y: 10.73%
• 3Y*: 41.69%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DM vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 49
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DM vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desktop Metal, Inc. (DM) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DM	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.58	—

Correlation

The correlation between DM and CRWD is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DM vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither DM nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DM	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-67.69%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-29.98%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.92%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DM	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	31.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	45.40%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	50.18%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	55.93%	—

Financials