DM vs. CRWD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DM (Desktop Metal, Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — DM in Computer Hardware, CRWD in Software - Infrastructure. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DM vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Desktop Metal, Inc. (DM) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWD

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: 59.32%
• YTD: 59.49%
• 6M: 42.63%
• 1Y: 52.96%
• 3Y*: 70.32%
• 5Y*: 29.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DM vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DM Desktop Metal, Inc.	0.00%	111.97%	-68.84%	-44.78%	-72.53%	-71.22%	72.34%	2.89%
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	59.49%	37.00%	34.01%	142.49%	-48.58%	-3.34%	324.74%	-14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DM and CRWD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019	0.26

The correlation between DM and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) DM : $168.28M CRWD : $4.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) DM : -$20.94M CRWD : $3.60B
EBITDA (TTM) DM : -$244.18M CRWD : -$39.16M

Return for Risk

DM vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWD

CRWD Risk / Return Rank: 70
CRWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CRWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CRWD Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CRWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CRWD Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DM vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desktop Metal, Inc. (DM) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DM	CRWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DM	CRWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-67.69%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-37.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-44.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.42%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.66%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.14%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DM	CRWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	44.66%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	50.73%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	55.95%	—

Dividends

DM vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison

Neither DM nor CRWD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DM and CRWD in my portfolio?

DM and CRWD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.