PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLS vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLS vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLS achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, DLS has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 7.86%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


DLS

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.24%
6M
3.30%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
7.86%
ALL TIME*
6.44%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.54M$1.48M$1.54M
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

DLS vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
8.42%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DLS and VYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.75

The correlation between DLS and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DLS vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DLS
VYM

Industrials

28.0%
12.6%

Financial Services

13.8%
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
6.8%

Technology

9.1%
17.8%

Basic Materials

9.0%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.1%

Real Estate

7.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.0%

Healthcare

3.6%
13.2%

Energy

2.4%
8.6%

Utilities

2.0%
5.7%

Industrials

DLS
28.0%
VYM
12.6%

Financial Services

DLS
13.8%
VYM
21.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DLS
12.9%
VYM
6.8%

Technology

DLS
9.1%
VYM
17.8%

Basic Materials

DLS
9.0%
VYM
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

DLS
7.7%
VYM
8.1%

Real Estate

DLS
7.4%
VYM
0.0%

Communication Services

DLS
4.2%
VYM
3.0%

Healthcare

DLS
3.6%
VYM
13.2%

Energy

DLS
2.4%
VYM
8.6%

Utilities

DLS
2.0%
VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLS vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLS vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLSVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.56

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.71

13.40

-7.69

DLS vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLS and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLS vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLS drawdown since its inception was -63.13%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLS and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLSVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.13%

-56.98%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-6.69%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-14.46%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.22%

-15.84%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.77%

-35.21%

-9.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-1.15%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-7.14%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.78%

+1.48%

Volatility

DLS vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund (DLS) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that DLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLSVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.46%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

7.42%

+4.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.89%

10.29%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

13.87%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.29%

+0.09%

DLS vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLS vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

DLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than VYM's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.51%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLS and VYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLS has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLS dropped -63.13% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.71% vs 7.86% for DLS. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.24% for VYM.

DLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VYM is Dividend. DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DLS and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLS and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer