DJP vs. RSP
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP).
DJP and RSP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DJP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index. It was launched on Jun 6, 2006. RSP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003. Both DJP and RSP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DJP or RSP.
Correlation
The correlation between DJP and RSP is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DJP vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DJP:
0.27
RSP:
1.36
DJP:
0.48
RSP:
1.92
DJP:
1.05
RSP:
1.24
DJP:
0.06
RSP:
2.19
DJP:
0.59
RSP:
7.22
DJP:
6.19%
RSP:
2.17%
DJP:
13.51%
RSP:
11.49%
DJP:
-78.35%
RSP:
-59.92%
DJP:
-56.86%
RSP:
-5.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJP achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 13.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DJP has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 0.22%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
DJP
3.82%
-0.94%
-2.35%
3.21%
6.83%
0.22%
RSP
13.31%
-2.82%
7.54%
14.27%
10.74%
9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DJP vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DJP vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DJP vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF | 1.15% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
DJP vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJP drawdown since its inception was -78.35%, which is greater than RSP's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJP and RSP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DJP vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) is 3.30%, while Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that DJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.