DIVO vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
DIVO and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DIVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Dec 13, 2016. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
DIVO vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DIVO vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 2.19% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 24.90% | -3.18% | 21.41% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.32% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 2.32% return.
DIVO
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIVO vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DIVO vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
DIVO
NOBL
DIVO vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVO | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 0.41 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.70 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.09 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 0.54 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.07 | 1.89 | +7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVO | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.41 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.44 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.64 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVO and NOBL is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DIVO vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than NOBL's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.48% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
DIVO vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and NOBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVO | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.04% | -35.43% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -11.20% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -17.92% | +4.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.96% | -7.07% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -3.45% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.18% | -1.23% |
Volatility
DIVO vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) have volatilities of 3.58% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DIVO | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 3.55% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.01% | 8.06% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.13% | 15.24% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.93% | 14.39% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 16.59% | -1.66% |