DIVGX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
DIVGX is managed by Guardian. It was launched on May 1, 2019. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DIVGX or FNDF.
Correlation
The correlation between DIVGX and FNDF is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DIVGX:
1.61
FNDF:
0.72
DIVGX:
2.23
FNDF:
1.04
DIVGX:
1.28
FNDF:
1.13
DIVGX:
2.90
FNDF:
0.90
DIVGX:
9.25
FNDF:
2.11
DIVGX:
1.82%
FNDF:
4.35%
DIVGX:
10.49%
FNDF:
12.84%
DIVGX:
-32.33%
FNDF:
-40.14%
DIVGX:
-1.43%
FNDF:
-2.91%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVGX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 7.08% return.
DIVGX
4.16%
1.23%
3.56%
14.68%
10.01%
N/A
FNDF
7.08%
4.31%
-1.02%
8.16%
8.44%
5.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DIVGX vs. FNDF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DIVGX
FNDF
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
DIVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than FNDF's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVGX Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund | 1.11% | 1.15% | 1.46% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.23% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.75% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVGX drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVGX and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) is 2.76%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that DIVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.