DIVGX vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
DIVGX is managed by Guardian. It was launched on May 1, 2019. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVGX Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund | -1.08% | 13.62% | 16.20% | 19.48% | -14.64% | 27.43% | 9.47% | 10.67% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 6.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVGX achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 8.23% return.
DIVGX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 11.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DIVGX vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
DIVGX
FNDF
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVGX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 2.31 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 3.02 | -1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 3.52 | -2.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 13.78 | -8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVGX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.31 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.78 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.49 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVGX and FNDF is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
DIVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.41%, more than FNDF's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVGX Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund | 27.41% | 27.35% | 1.15% | 1.46% | 3.08% | 1.36% | 1.22% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Drawdowns
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVGX drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVGX and FNDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVGX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.33% | -40.14% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -11.08% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.86% | -25.56% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -7.26% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -7.72% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.83% | -0.88% |
Volatility
DIVGX vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guardian Capital Dividend Growth Fund (DIVGX) is 3.61%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that DIVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DIVGX | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 8.06% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.79% | 11.42% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.96% | 17.50% | -4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 16.05% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 17.64% | -0.85% |