DINO vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DINO (HF Sinclair Corp) is a stock, while FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, DINO returned 18.11%/yr vs 14.21%/yr for FBCG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DINO vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DINO achieves a 45.33% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's 13.26% return.

DINO

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 45.33%
• 6M: 43.68%
• 1Y: 63.21%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 18.11%
• 10Y*: 14.36%

FBCG

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: 35.82%
• 3Y*: 28.79%
• 5Y*: 14.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DINO vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	45.33%	38.14%	-34.36%	11.04%	61.94%	27.97%	-21.04%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	13.26%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	41.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DINO and FBCG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.17

The correlation between DINO and FBCG shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DINO vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DINO

DINO Risk / Return Rank: 84
DINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DINO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DINO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 53
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DINO vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.83	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.46	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	2.37	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.26	8.97	+0.29

DINO vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DINO Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DINO and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DINO vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DINO drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINO and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.99%	-43.56%	-42.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.57%	-15.17%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.35%	-27.89%	-29.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.35%	-43.56%	-13.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.01%	-3.04%	-7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.01%	-11.42%	-16.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.85%	4.00%	+2.85%

Volatility

DINO vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 7.75%. This indicates that DINO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.95%	7.75%	+3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.00%	15.30%	+14.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.61%	19.67%	+16.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.69%	25.97%	+12.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.23%	25.78%	+18.45%

Dividends

DINO vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

DINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	3.04%	4.34%	5.71%	3.24%	2.31%	1.07%	5.42%	2.64%	2.58%	2.58%	4.03%	3.28%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DINO and FBCG in my portfolio?

DINO and FBCG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DINO or FBCG?

DINO has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to FBCG (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DINO dropped -85.99% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.