DINO vs. FBCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG).

FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020.

Performance

DINO vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DINO vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	36.76%	38.14%	-34.36%	11.04%	61.94%	27.97%	-22.67%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	42.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DINO achieves a 36.76% return, which is significantly higher than FBCG's -8.61% return.

DINO

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 26.01%
• YTD: 36.76%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 98.15%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 13.97%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

DINO vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DINO

DINO Risk / Return Rank: 92
DINO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DINO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DINO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DINO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DINO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DINO vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	0.97	+1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.54	+1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.22	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	1.65	+2.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	5.92	+7.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DINO vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DINO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DINO and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	0.97	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.43	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.67	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between DINO and FBCG is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DINO vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

DINO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DINO HF Sinclair Corp	3.21%	4.34%	5.71%	3.24%	2.31%	1.07%	5.42%	2.64%	2.58%	2.58%	4.03%	3.28%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DINO vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DINO drawdown since its inception was -85.99%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DINO and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.99%	-43.56%	-42.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.91%	-15.17%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.35%	-43.56%	-13.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-11.09%	+8.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.16%	-11.79%	-16.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.47%	4.23%	+3.24%

Volatility

DINO vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

HF Sinclair Corp (DINO) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) at 8.22%. This indicates that DINO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DINO	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.72%	8.22%	+4.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.78%	14.74%	+13.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.97%	26.28%	+13.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.87%	25.82%	+13.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.30%	25.92%	+18.38%