PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIA vs. UDOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIA vs. UDOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than UDOW's 12.27% return. Over the past 10 years, DIA has underperformed UDOW with an annualized return of 13.21%, while UDOW has yielded a comparatively higher 23.30% annualized return.


DIA

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
6.26%
6M
6.75%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
16.45%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
13.21%

UDOW

1D
-3.38%
1M
10.84%
YTD
12.27%
6M
12.78%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
33.01%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
23.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIA vs. UDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
6.26%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
12.27%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DIA and UDOW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

1.00

The correlation between DIA and UDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIA vs. UDOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIA
UDOW

Financial Services

27.2%
27.2%

Industrials

18.4%
18.4%

Technology

17.1%
17.1%

Healthcare

13.1%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%
4.0%

Energy

2.4%
2.4%

Communication Services

1.9%
1.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

DIA
27.2%
UDOW
27.2%

Industrials

DIA
18.4%
UDOW
18.4%

Technology

DIA
17.1%
UDOW
17.1%

Healthcare

DIA
13.1%
UDOW
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DIA
11.6%
UDOW
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

DIA
4.4%
UDOW
4.4%

Basic Materials

DIA
4.0%
UDOW
4.0%

Energy

DIA
2.4%
UDOW
2.4%

Communication Services

DIA
1.9%
UDOW
1.9%

Real Estate

DIA

-

UDOW

-

Utilities

DIA

-

UDOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIA vs. UDOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIA vs. UDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIAUDOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.90

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

6.75

+1.67

DIA vs. UDOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the UDOW Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIA and UDOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIAUDOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.48

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.29

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.45

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.53

-0.04

Drawdowns

DIA vs. UDOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, smaller than the maximum UDOW drawdown of -80.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and UDOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIAUDOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-80.29%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-28.07%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-44.83%

+28.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-55.79%

+35.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-80.29%

+43.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-3.38%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-14.39%

+7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

7.90%

-5.38%

Volatility

DIA vs. UDOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) is 2.97%, while ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that DIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIAUDOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

8.80%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

27.61%

-18.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

36.12%

-24.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.78%

44.19%

-29.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.53%

51.76%

-34.23%

DIA vs. UDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than UDOW's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIA vs. UDOW - Dividend Comparison

DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than UDOW's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.38%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.21%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DIA and UDOW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UDOW has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to DIA (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs UDOW's -80.29%.

On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.30% vs 13.21% for DIA. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.30% return vs 13.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UDOW.

DIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.21% for UDOW.

DIA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UDOW is Leveraged Equities. DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.95% for UDOW.

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIA and UDOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer