DIA.AS vs. SSO
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO).
DIA.AS and SSO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DIA.AS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. It was launched on Jan 13, 1998. SSO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both DIA.AS and SSO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DIA.AS or SSO.
Key characteristics
| DIA.AS | SSO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.22% | 49.45% |
| 1Y Return | 29.57% | 73.91% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.56% | 11.46% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.03% | 23.28% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.68% | 20.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.51 | 3.02 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.81 | 3.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.74 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.59 | 3.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.69 | 18.60 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.56% | 3.95% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.55% | 24.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.44% | -84.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.10% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIA.AS and SSO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DIA.AS vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DIA.AS achieves a 22.22% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 49.45% return. Over the past 10 years, DIA.AS has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 11.68%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIA.AS vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIA.AS has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DIA.AS vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DIA.AS vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
DIA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA.AS SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P 500 | 0.68% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% | 0.32% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
DIA.AS vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIA.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA.AS and SSO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DIA.AS vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) is 4.70%, while ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that DIA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.