DIA.AS vs. SCHF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF).
DIA.AS and SCHF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DIA.AS is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Value TR USD. It was launched on Jan 13, 1998. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both DIA.AS and SCHF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DIA.AS or SCHF.
Key characteristics
| DIA.AS | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.67% | 5.90% |
| 1Y Return | 19.33% | 13.62% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.86% | 2.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.34% | 7.71% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.12% | 4.82% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.26 | 1.07 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.77% | 12.49% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.72% | -34.87% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.11% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIA.AS and SCHF is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DIA.AS vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DIA.AS achieves a 7.67% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DIA.AS has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 12.12%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIA.AS vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIA.AS has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DIA.AS vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DIA.AS vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
DIA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA.AS SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% | 2.90% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
DIA.AS vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIA.AS drawdown since its inception was -60.72%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA.AS and SCHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DIA.AS vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA.AS) is 2.79%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that DIA.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.