PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHLAX vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHLAX vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund (DHLAX) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHLAX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 15.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DHLAX having a 10.50% annualized return and IJR not far ahead at 10.66%.


DHLAX

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
0.22%
6M
1.63%
1Y
3.08%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
10.50%

IJR

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.67%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.25%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHLAX vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHLAX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund
0.22%5.34%22.53%13.36%-13.67%25.40%8.63%31.84%-9.89%19.93%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.38%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DHLAX and IJR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2001

0.84

The correlation between DHLAX and IJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHLAX vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHLAX
DHLAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DHLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DHLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHLAX vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund (DHLAX) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHLAXIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.31

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

3.65

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

12.14

-10.82

DHLAX vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHLAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHLAX and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHLAXIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.81

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.26

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.47

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.43

+0.02

Drawdowns

DHLAX vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHLAX drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLAX and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHLAXIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.68%

-58.15%

+5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-8.68%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-28.02%

+13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

-28.02%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

-44.36%

+5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

-0.91%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-9.28%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.60%

+0.64%

Volatility

DHLAX vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund (DHLAX) is 2.74%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that DHLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHLAXIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

4.45%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

11.65%

-3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

17.54%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

21.41%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

22.91%

-4.59%

DHLAX vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHLAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHLAX vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

DHLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHLAX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund
6.04%6.05%19.46%3.07%6.34%7.28%3.01%4.50%4.28%4.53%6.30%4.79%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHLAX and IJR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to DHLAX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHLAX dropped -52.68% vs IJR's -58.15%.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHLAX and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer