PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGSIX vs. VTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGSIX having a 8.39% return and VTHRX slightly lower at 8.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DGSIX having a 8.70% annualized return and VTHRX not far ahead at 8.92%.


DGSIX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.26%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.91%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
8.70%

VTHRX

1D
0.24%
1M
3.58%
YTD
8.06%
6M
8.61%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGSIX
DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio
8.39%14.06%11.31%14.59%-12.10%14.24%11.58%18.17%-6.41%13.11%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
8.06%16.25%10.43%16.24%-16.28%11.37%14.11%21.08%-5.85%15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DGSIX and VTHRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2006

0.97

The correlation between DGSIX and VTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGSIX vs. VTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGSIX
DGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VTHRX
VTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGSIXVTHRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

2.48

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

3.53

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.04

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.79

13.35

+1.44

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the VTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGSIX and VTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGSIXVTHRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.48

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.69

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.50

+0.12

Drawdowns

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGSIX drawdown since its inception was -41.64%, smaller than the maximum VTHRX drawdown of -49.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSIX and VTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSIXVTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.64%

-49.57%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-6.56%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.43%

-9.64%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.36%

-22.75%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.59%

-24.86%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.43%

-6.19%

+1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.49%

-0.16%

Volatility

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio (DGSIX) is 2.28%, while Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that DGSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSIXVTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.60%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

6.53%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.47%

8.07%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.19%

10.37%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.38%

11.26%

-0.88%

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGSIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VTHRX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGSIX vs. VTHRX - Dividend Comparison

DGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than VTHRX's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGSIX
DFA Global Allocation 60/40 Portfolio
7.96%8.56%7.25%5.27%4.55%5.53%3.39%2.61%3.01%1.29%1.23%1.92%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
3.73%4.03%3.63%2.59%2.53%17.56%2.56%2.38%2.71%0.06%2.38%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DGSIX and VTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTHRX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to DGSIX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGSIX dropped -41.64% vs VTHRX's -49.57%.

DGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGSIX and VTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer