PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS vs. DEMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS vs. DEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than DEMSX's 11.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DGS has outperformed DEMSX with an annualized return of 9.93%, while DEMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.


DGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.57%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
9.93%

DEMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.92%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.50%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS vs. DEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.53%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%18.90%-16.52%37.47%
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
11.52%19.01%4.92%16.32%-15.30%19.54%13.82%14.89%-17.55%33.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and DEMSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2007

0.86

The correlation between DGS and DEMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS vs. DEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMSX
DEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS vs. DEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGSDEMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.36

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.39

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

8.51

+0.65

DGS vs. DEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and DEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGSDEMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.87

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.64

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.61

-0.39

Drawdowns

DGS vs. DEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, smaller than the maximum DEMSX drawdown of -66.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and DEMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSDEMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-66.70%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-10.30%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-17.21%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

-24.40%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-47.28%

+3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.86%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-13.60%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.88%

+0.10%

Volatility

DGS vs. DEMSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) at 4.74%. This indicates that DGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSDEMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.74%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

10.98%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

13.21%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

13.29%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

14.79%

+2.53%

DGS vs. DEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMSX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGS vs. DEMSX - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than DEMSX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
3.42%3.79%3.27%2.94%4.47%10.20%2.25%3.11%5.02%3.41%3.74%3.24%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.21%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGS and DEMSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGS has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to DEMSX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs DEMSX's -66.70%.

DEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS and DEMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer