PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRS has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 9.61%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.27% annualized return.


DGRS

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
13.56%
6M
12.71%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
9.61%

XLG

1D
-1.15%
1M
4.22%
YTD
7.57%
6M
7.32%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
17.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRS vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
13.56%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%7.25%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
7.57%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and XLG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2013

0.60

The correlation between DGRS and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRS vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
XLG

Financial Services

24.8%
9.6%

Industrials

19.0%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
11.3%

Energy

12.0%
2.7%

Technology

8.7%
43.9%

Basic Materials

7.6%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.8%

Communication Services

2.0%
17.1%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Healthcare

1.3%
7.0%

Utilities

0.2%

-

Financial Services

DGRS
24.8%
XLG
9.6%

Industrials

DGRS
19.0%
XLG
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.5%
XLG
11.3%

Energy

DGRS
12.0%
XLG
2.7%

Technology

DGRS
8.7%
XLG
43.9%

Basic Materials

DGRS
7.6%
XLG
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.3%
XLG
5.8%

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
XLG
17.1%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.7%
XLG

-

Healthcare

DGRS
1.3%
XLG
7.0%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
XLG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRS vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRSXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.31

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

8.66

-0.66

DGRS vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRSXLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.15

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.87

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.92

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.62

-0.22

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-52.39%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-12.41%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-20.70%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-28.02%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

-30.46%

-14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-1.44%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-7.64%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.30%

-0.15%

Volatility

DGRS vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 3.19%. This indicates that DGRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

3.19%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

9.80%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

13.33%

+4.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

18.68%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

18.84%

+4.79%

DGRS vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.23%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRS and XLG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRS has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.27% vs 9.61% for DGRS. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.27% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

DGRS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.20% for XLG.

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer